In Illinois v. Caballes (2005), the Court held that “a dog sniff conducted during a concededly lawful traffic
In Illinois v. Caballes (2005), the Court held that “a dog sniff conducted during a concededly lawful traffic stop that reveals no information other than the location of a substance that no individual has any right to possess does not violate the Fourth Amendment.” Discuss the case and the Court’s reasoning that the “dog sniff” …