Page 1 of 2
Simulation Reflection – Cultural Competency
General Instructions
• Access the simulation “Cultural Competency”. • Complete the simulation, taking note of what actions/decisions were successful
and which actions/decisions lead to suggestions or other feedback. Make note that feedback to include/discuss in the attached reflection activity.
• Below is a set of questions that will help you reflect on the experience and think critically about the choices you made during the simulation.
o Briefly describe the situation. o Describe the leadership standards that were involved. Be sure you
discuss how the leadership standards are involved in this specific situation (do not just list them).
o Reflect on your experience: ▪ What decisions did you make that went well? Describe.
▪ What decisions did you make that you would do differently? Why?
o What have you learned from this experience that will impact your future
leadership?
o Share your thoughts on completing the simulation in general.
• Submit your responses to the questions for evaluation.
Scoring Guidelines
Points available: 10.
Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target
Description and Standards: A brief description of the
scenario is provided, and appropriate standards are
identified and aligned with the scenario.
No description is shared, and no standards are
identified, or they are not applicable. (0 points)
A brief description of the scenario is shared, but appropriate standards are not identified and
aligned with the scenario. (1 point)
A clear description of the scenario is shared, and appropriate standards
are identified and aligned with the scenario.
(2 points)
Reflection: Positive decisions are identified
and the impact on learning is described.
The reflection is not adequate and does not
describe positive decisions or learning that
occurred. (0 points)
The reflection describes positive decisions but does not include clear
justifications that support the learning are
described. (1 point)
The reflection includes positive decisions made
and clear, well-developed justifications that support the learning
are described. (2 points)
Page 2 of 2
Component Unacceptable Acceptable Target
Reflection: Ineffective decisions are identified
and suggestions for improvements are
outlined.
The reflection is not adequate and does not
describe ineffective decisions or suggestions
for improvement. (0 points)
The reflection describes ineffective decisions but does not include clear
suggestions for improvement. (1 point)
The reflection includes ineffective decisions and
clear, well-developed suggestions for
improvement. (2 points)
Leadership Impacts: Clear connections to
future leadership style and choices are
provided.
No connections between the experience and
future leadership style and choices are
identified. (0 points)
Connections between the experience and
future leadership style and choices are identified, but not justified. (1 point)
Connections between the experience and
future leadership style and choices are identified, and
justifications are thorough and clear.
(2 points)
Professional Presentation:
Reflections are free of grammar, mechanics, and spelling errors.
Writing contains 3 or more errors. (0 points)
Writing contains minimum errors (1-2
errors). (1 point)
Writing is free of errors. (2 points)
- Simulation Reflection – Cultural Competency
- General Instructions
- Scoring Guidelines
