|
TCHR5010: Competency and capability of Preschoolers
Assessment Two: Portfolio
Information Booklet
Assessment name: |
Portfolio of planning cycle |
Due Date: |
Monday 12th June 2023 @ 11:59pm |
Weighting: |
60% |
Length: |
2000 words |
Task Description: |
This Portfolio is comprised of two tasks. You must submit your assessment as one document. Task 1: Anecdotal record and learning experience Demonstrate how you have engaged in the planning cycle during your professional experience. Choose and submit your best detailed anecdotal record of your focus child and a learning experience plan that you implemented to extend on your observation and analysis of the child. Task 2: Reflective practice (approximately 1000 words) During your professional experience, you were required to complete daily reflections and highlight any ethical considerations or dilemmas you encountered. Reflect on your daily entries and explain one ethical dilemma that you observed or experienced yourself. · How did you or other educators respond to the issue? · What did you do well? · What could you have done better? · Was consideration given to all stakeholders’ perspectives in the decision-making process for resolving the issue? How? Make direct links to the unit’s readings, the EYLF and the NQS. |
Referencing |
APA 7th referencing format is required in Faculty of Education assessment tasks – link to SCU Libguide here: |
Support Resources |
– SCU guidelines – mandatory module for first year students – workshops, Quick Guides, student appointments |
Submission |
The due date for this assessment is Monday, 12th June 2023 by 11:59pm Submission of your assessment is via TURNITIN. The submission link can be found in the Assessment Tasks and Submission Tab in the TCHR5010 Blackboard site. Please note: · It is YOUR responsibility to ensure that you have submitted the correct file and the FINAL version of your assessment for marking BEFORE the due date/time. · After you have followed the TurnItin submission process you must download the digital receipt. · If you have any difficulty submitting your assignment, please contact and make sure that you log a job with them so you have evidence of your attempted submission. To avoid any last-minute problems, make sure you submit well before 11:00pm on the due date. |
Late Submission/Extension |
If you need to apply for special consideration you may do so According to SCU Policy, late penalties apply. More information found |
Academic Integrity At Southern Cross University academic integrity means behaving with the values of honesty, fairness, trustworthiness, courage, responsibility and respect in relation to academic work. The Southern Cross University Academic Integrity Framework aims to develop a holistic, systematic and consistent approach to addressing academic integrity across the entire University. For more information see the |
Assessment 2: Portfolio MARKING RUBRIC |
|||||
Criteria |
High Distinction |
Distinction |
Credit |
Pass |
Fail |
Task 1: Anecdotal record and learning experience (30%) Articulation of the planning cycle during professional experience. Anecdotal record shows evidence of understanding children’s learning and development with links to theory, the EYLF and NQS. Demonstrates planning for Preschoolers’ learning and development, interests and competencies with links to the EYLF, NQS and theory. |
Demonstrated excellent articulation of the planning cycle including: Excellent anecdotal record of Preschool child that shows evidence of understanding Preschoolers’ learning and development with links to theory, the EYLF and NQS. Excellent learning experience plan that extends on the Preschool child’s interests and competencies with links to the EYLF, NQS and theory |
Demonstrated very good articulation of the planning cycle including: Insightful anecdotal record of Preschool child that shows evidence of understanding Preschoolers’ learning and development with links to theory, the EYLF and NQS. Insightful learning experience plan that extends on the Preschool child’s interests and competencies with links to the EYLF, NQS and theory |
Demonstrated good articulation of the planning cycle including: Good anecdotal record of Preschool child that shows evidence of understanding Preschoolers’ learning and development with links to theory, the EYLF and NQS. Good learning experience plan that extends on the Preschool child’s interests and competencies with links to the EYLF, NQS and theory |
Demonstrated satisfactory articulation of the planning cycle including: Satisfactory anecdotal record of Preschool child that shows evidence of understanding Preschoolers’ learning and development with links to theory, the EYLF and NQS. Satisfactory learning experience plan that extends on the Preschool child’s interests and competencies with links to the EYLF, NQS and theory |
Does not show evidence of understanding the planning cycle. Unsatisfactory anecdotal record of Preschool child that shows evidence of understanding Preschoolers’ learning and development with links to theory, the EYLF and NQS. Unsatisfactory learning experience plan that extends on the Preschool child’s interests and competencies with links to the EYLF, NQS and theory |
Task 2: Reflective practice (20%) Reflection and response to one ethical dilemma encountered during professional experience with consideration to: -What went well -What could have been done better -All involved stakeholders’ perspectives -The unit’s readings, the EYLF and the NQS, and scholarly sources. |
Demonstrated outstanding reflective practice with consideration to: -What went well -What could have been done better -All involved stakeholders’ perspectives -The unit’s readings, the EYLF and the NQS, and scholarly sources. |
Demonstrated insightful reflective practice with consideration to: -What went well -What could have been done better -All involved stakeholders’ perspectives – The unit’s readings, the EYLF and the NQS, and scholarly sources. |
Demonstrated solid reflective practice with consideration to: -What went well -What could have been done better -All involved stakeholders’ perspectives – The unit’s readings, the EYLF and the NQS, and scholarly sources. |
Demonstrated satisfactory reflective practice with consideration to: -What went well -What could have been done better -All involved stakeholders’ perspectives – The unit’s readings, the EYLF and the NQS, and scholarly sources. |
Demonstrated poor reflective practice with limited consideration to: -What went well -What could have been done better -All involved stakeholders’ perspectives – The unit’s readings, the EYLF and the NQS, and scholarly sources. |
Academic literacy (10%) |
Displayed outstanding Academic Literacy, including all of the following: Correct word count (+/- 10%), correct writing conventions, correctly formatted reference list |
Displayed comprehensive Academic Literacy, including all or most of the following: Correct word count (+/- 10%), correct writing conventions, correctly formatted reference list |
Displayed solid Academic Literacy, including some or most of the following: Correct word count (+/- 10%), correct writing conventions, correctly formatted reference list |
Displayed satisfactory Academic Literacy, including some of the following: Correct word count (+/- 10%), correct writing conventions, correctly formatted reference list |
Failed to display satisfactory Academic Literacy. Incorrect word count, incorrect writing conventions, incorrectly formatted reference list |