1- Provide a brief description regarding the cases (Pinto Case)
2- What are the ethical principles applied in this case?
3- Based on the new understating of Stakeholders’ concept, which Stakeholder group (s) got affected (from least to most) and how?
4- What was/were the legal obligations, if any, and how it was/were differentiated from ethical and moral ones?
5- While there are four responsibilities in theCarroll’s Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility, how does the case prioritized each responsibility?
6- In your judgment, did each management satisfy the interest of their stockholders? How.
7- If you were in the decision maker back then, what could you have done to deal with the issue at hand in this case?
