Harker’s assessment that both climate change skepticism and the controversy over evolution/intelligent design are “created controversies?”
Site: bid4papers.com
Read Part III:
Exposing Created Controversies
Do you agree with Harker’s assessment that both climate change skepticism and the controversy over evolution/intelligent design are “created controversies?” If you agree, what is Harker’s weakest argument in support of his conclusion? If you disagree, what is Harker’s strongest argument in support of his conclusion? Explain, either way.
Your Initial Post:
1. State what you think is the main point or thesis of the article assigned for reading the day this discussion is due.
2. Explain why you think that, and provide textual justification for your claim in the form of exegesis, not direct quotation.
3. Share some critical remarks about the article. What did the author overlook, get wrong, or what are some potential implications of the author’s claims that may be problematic in some way?
