Assume you are currently Gad’s counselor and are practicing in your own state.
Identify the Problem
Identify the main problem and related concerns to be addressed in this report in 1-2 bullets,
as if you are writing it to your supervisor for their review. This will set the stage for the
remainder of this document utilizing the embedded ethical decision-making guide. Each
bullet should be 2-3 complete sentences.
Apply Ethical Codes, State Laws, and Select one Ethical Principle of Primary Relevance
Confidentiality is one of the major ethical codes that is implicated by this case. Paraphrase
the relevant professional ethical code and provide a reference citation. Do not quote the code
directly. (This bullet should be 1-2 complete sentences).
Review your state laws and identify one law that impacts this case. If you do not have a duty
to warn law in your state, discuss this implication. Paraphrase the law followed by a
reference citation to the specific legal statutes from your professional counseling board. Do
not quote the law directly but paraphrase it. This bullet should be 2-3 complete sentences.
Selecting one ethical principle (autonomy, justice, beneficence, autonomy, non-maleficence)
you believe to be the priority in this case. Use your professional judgement and tie in
resources to support your points. Each bullet should be 1-2 complete sentences.
Diversity and Inclusion Considerations
List 1 diversity consideration (e.g., power, privilege, oppression, discrimination,
confidentiality, cultural practices, cultural identity, etc.) from the client perspective. Each
bullet should be 1-2 complete sentences.
Based on actual Pennsylvania Supreme Court case, Emerich v. Philadelphia Center for Human Development Inc.
