According to the data, several possible signs of age discrimination call for additional inquiry. One possible term for employer bias based on age (often 40 or older) is “age discrimination.” Possible causes of age discrimination include the following:
• The statement states that I was the only manager anyone could identify who drove an old automobile and did not have a smartphone. The stereotypes associated with one’s age may affect how people interact with them.
• The chief executive officer remarked how I do not present as a company that places a premium on technical innovation and efficiency. It is implied that workers above a certain age who do not fit the ideal profile are being discriminated against.
• The senior vice president of human resources disclosed that some employees felt I was becoming disruptive to the workplace. One theory blames a subtle form of ageism, while another points to generational disparities in socializing preferences and expectations (Corbett, 2021).
• The Chief of Security effectively threatened me with termination without providing me with a fair investigation or due process when he threatened to restrict my access to the building instantly.
The first signs of age discrimination have been presented above; more evidence, such as proof of discriminatory intent or behaviors on the company’s part, should be gathered to support the case.
Question 2
A lawyer asserting age discrimination under Title VII would need to show the following in order to succeed in court:
• Membership in a protected class: Age discrimination in the workplace is illegal under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act if one is 40 or older (Dugard, 2021). One’s dedication to the ABC Company over four decades warrants this award. This piece of evidence lends credence to the argument.
• Adverse employment action: This term refers to any negative result in the workplace, including but not limited to termination, demotion, or significant changes to terms and conditions of employment. A dismissal is an indisputably negative job action. This data lends credence to one’s argument (Dugard, 2021).
• Discriminatory Motive: One must show that the dismissal had something to do with their age to win an age discrimination claim. The CEO and HR VP may have had discriminatory intent when commenting on age and dependency on technology.
• Establishing pretext: The attorney must show that the reasons ABC Company gave for the termination (such as a perceived image mismatch, challenges in adjusting to new technologies, or a lack of teamwork) were just pretexts to win a case based on age discrimination. Establishing a pretext requires showing that the stated reasons are misleading or inconsistent. The CEO and HR VP’s statements provide plenty of evidence for speculation of discriminatory intent, but it may take more than that to prove a pretext. It is key to gather as much evidence as possible to support their claim, including
