Should the presence of skin cells at a crime scene or on a victims body be a sufficient basis for DNA evidence alone to lead to a criminal conviction?

Should the presence of skin cells at a crime scene or on a victims body be a sufficient basis for DNA evidence alone to lead to a criminal conviction? What if someone has a skin condition involving shedding skin cells, such as psoriasis, and a crime victim picked up those cells unknowingly from riding in a taxicab were those skin cells were left behind by the previous passenger?  If you were a prosecutor, what specific things would you communicate to the police about their crime scene investigations? What specific things would you communicate to jurors about DNA evidence?

Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!