Peer Review Questions

1. The job application package is complete, containing one application letter and one tailored résumé. Each document is complete and contains all required elements as stated in the handout. Does the document contain both the application letter and résumé?

· The document contains both a cover letter and a resume. Both appear to adhere to requirements other than the Objective and References. According to the assignment requirements, we were asked to “ DO NOT write an objective statement or include “References Available Upon Request” (Employers assume your objective–to get a job–and also indicate if they want references)”.

2. The letter and résumé are tailored to the specific job for which your peer is “applying” and include information relevant to that job. The information included makes clear why this person is qualified for the job. List the desired job and one possible qualification given.

· Desired Position: “Registered Nurse position at Wyckoff Heights Medical Center”

· One qualification listed: “I am enthusiastic about the chance to contribute my skills and knowledge to your respected institution as a committed healthcare professional with more than 16 years of experience as a surgical technologist.”

3. The résumé is clean and well organized. The use of space is uniform and well considered. Identify any inconsistencies in organization.

· The resume seems to be organized, However, maybe some color to spruce it up a bit? Other than it being a little plain, it is well organized.

4. The font and type size are easy to read. Different levels of headings are used consistently to demarcate different levels and categories. List any inconsistencies in headings or categories used.

· The font is easy to read and there is bolded heading to highlight sections.

5. The description of job duties and responsibilities at each position include vivid, concrete, action verbs (in past tense if you no longer hold the position). List two examples of inconsistencies in verb tense, if applicable.

· The job duties and responsibilities listed appear to be concrete and describe position clearly.

6. These verbs are in parallel structure. The style and tone are formal. Paragraphs utilize effective topic sentences. Does each sentence have a topic sentence? If not, copy/paste a sentence that could be the topic sentence.

· Everything appears to be listed as required. Headings are bolded and there are bullet points to list the qualifications.

7. The letter and résumé are each formatted correctly following the specified guidelines in the textbook and assignment instructions. The letter and résumé do not contain information that is prohibited in the assignment instructions. Identify two missing items in formatting, if applicable.

· The “Object and References” are listed when we were instructed no to.

8. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are correct. If there are errors, point those out to your peer.

· I did not see Grammar or punctuation mistakes, however, there were two words misspelled.

· Misspelled word 1: “patient-centred” in the cover letter.

· Misspelled word 2: “centres” under the Interests and activities section.

9. Rate how well the paper aligns with the assignment guidelines: (minimal = does not meet assignment guidelines; medium = meets about 75% of the assignment guidelines; very high = meets 95% or above of the assignment guidelines)

Minimal

Low

Medium

High

Very high

10. Suggestions for meeting the assignment guidelines.

· I say maybe add some color and bolder headings, take out the objective and reference wording you put, and you are good to go.

11. Write a final comment to your peer about two of the overall strengths and one overall weakness of the first draft.

· Overall, great job. It is formatted well and it is neat. Just fix the listed things above and your paper is perfect. Great Job and I wish you the best.