Scoring Rubric
Evidence-based intervention/treatment modality or program/leadership project
Criteria |
Meets or Exceeds Expectations |
Working Toward Expectations |
Falls Below Expectations |
Unacceptable |
Points |
Knowledge and description of Intervention/modality or program/leadership project |
Clearly & fully articulates topic area, all aspects of modality or program, multicultural skills, and knowledge gleaned. 8 points |
Adequately articulates topic area, all aspects of modality or program, multicultural skills, and knowledge gleaned. 6-7 points |
Limited articulation of topic area, all aspects of modality or program, multicultural skills, and knowledge gleaned. 1-5 points |
Fails to articulate topic area, all aspects of modality or program, multicultural skills, or knowledge gleaned. 0 points |
___ / 8 |
Primary developers and history of topic area |
Fully explores all primary developers and topic history. 6 points |
Adequately details primary developers and history of topic area. 4-5 points |
Limited details of developers and history of topic area. 1-3 points |
Fails to detail developers and history of topic area. 0 points |
___ / 6 |
Primary modern uses and/or strategies in social work practice of topic area. How implemented in Field Practicum placement. |
Clearly and fully articulates the modern uses and/or strategies of topic area in social work practice and how implemented in field. 6 points |
Adequately articulates the modern uses and/or strategies of topic area in social work practice and how implemented in field. 4-5 points |
Limited articulation of modern uses and/or strategies of topic area in social work practice and how implemented in field. 1-3 points |
Fails to articulate the modern uses and/or strategies of topic area in social work practice and how implemented in field. 0 points |
___ / 6 |
Literature review & bibliography |
Fully describes articles/books, modality or program (from previously created annotated bibliography) and how these pieces of literature inform practice. The literature reviewed is included at the end of the paper as a bibliography using proper APA formatting (no or few formatting mistakes are present). 10 points |
Adequately describes articles/books, modality or program (from previously created annotated bibliography) and how these pieces of literature inform practice. The literature reviewed is included at the end of the paper as a bibliography using proper APA formatting (several formatting mistakes are present). 7-9 points |
Limited description of articles/books, modality or program (from previously created annotated bibliography) and how these pieces of literature inform practice. The literature reviewed is included at the end of the paper as a bibliography but not properly formatted in APA style. 1-6 points |
Fails to include review of literature and/or properly formatted bibliography. 0 points |
___ / 10 |
Implications for social work practice using chosen modality or program |
Fully explores use and implications of modality or program. 5 points |
Adequately explores use and implications of modality or program. 3-4 points |
Limited details are provided on implications/use. 1-2 points |
Fails to provide implications. 0 points |
___ / 5 |
Reflection on learning, grown, and professional development |
Clearly articulates reflections on learning, growth, and professional development. 5 points |
Adequately articulates reflections on learning, growth, and professional development. 3-4 points |
Limited details in reflections on learning, growth, and professional development. 1-2 points |
Fails to reflect on learning, growth, and professional development. 0 points |
___ / 5 |
TOTAL |
___ / 50 |