Practicum Journal: Purpose – Rubric
Practicum Activities Re�ection 10 points
Criteria Description
5. Target 10 points
A reflection of the observations and activities in the practicum setting is thorough
and includes substantial supporting details.
4. Acceptable 9.2 points
A reflection of the observations and activities in the practicum setting is complete
and includes relevant supporting details.
3. Approaching 8.8 points
A reflection of the observations and activities in the practicum setting is included
but lacks relevant supporting details.
2. Insufficient 8 points
A reflection of the observations and activities in the practicum setting is incomplete
or incorrect.
Application of Leadership 8 points
Criteria Description
5. Target 8 points
A description of the application of leadership skills in the professional setting is
thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
4. Acceptable 7.36 points
A description of the application of leadership skills in the professional setting is
complete and includes relevant supporting details.
3. Approaching 7.04 points
Collapse All
A description of the application of leadership skills in the professional setting is
included but lacks relevant supporting details.
2. Insufficient 6.4 points
A description of the application of leadership skills in the professional setting is
incomplete or incorrect.
Practicum Project Preparation 8 points
Criteria Description
5. Target 8 points
A description of the work done towards planning and completion of the practicum
project is thorough and includes substantial supporting details.
4. Acceptable 7.36 points
A description of the work done towards planning and completion of the practicum
project is complete and includes relevant supporting details.
3. Approaching 7.04 points
A description of the work done towards planning and completion of the practicum
project is included but lacks relevant supporting details.
2. Insufficient 6.4 points
A description of the work done towards planning and completion of the practicum
project is incomplete or incorrect.
1. Unsatisfactory 0 points
A description of the work done towards planning and completion of the practicum
Leadership Video Re�ection 8 points
Criteria Description
5. Target 8 points
A reflection on learning resulting from the assigned leadership video is thorough
and includes substantial supporting details.
4. Acceptable 7.36 points
A reflection on learning resulting from the assigned leadership video is complete
and includes relevant supporting details.
3. Approaching 7.04 points
A reflection on learning resulting from the assigned leadership video is included but
lacks relevant supporting details.
2. Insufficient 6.4 points
A reflection on learning resulting from the assigned leadership video is incomplete
or incorrect.
Mechanics of Writing 2 points
Criteria Description
Includes spelling, capitalization, punctuation, grammar, language use, sentence
structure, etc.
5. Target 2 points
No mechanical errors are present. Skilled control of language choice and sentence
structure are used throughout.
4. Acceptable 1.84 points
Few mechanical errors are present. Suitable language choice and sentence
structure are used.
3. Approaching 1.76 points
Occasional mechanical errors are present. Language choice is generally
appropriate. Varied sentence structure is attempted.
2. Insufficient 1.6 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors are present. Inconsistencies in language
choice or sentence structure are recurrent.
Format/Documentation 4 points
Criteria Description
Uses appropriate style, such as APA, MLA, etc., for college, subject, and level;
documents sources using citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc.,
appropriate to assignment and discipline.
5. Target 4 points
No errors in formatting or documentation are present. Selectivity in the use of
direct quotations and synthesis of sources is demonstrated.
4. Acceptable 3.68 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used with only minor errors.
3. Approaching 3.52 points
Appropriate format and documentation are used, although there are some obvious
errors.
2. Insufficient 3.2 points
Appropriate format is attempted, but some elements are missing. Frequent errors
in documentation of sources are evident.
Total 40 points
