Which of Harker’s conclusions about the status of controversies over issues of public health do you find the least convincing? First, explain Harker’s conclusion about the controversy you have chosen, then explain why you find it less convincing than the others.
Your Initial Post:
1. State what you think is the main point or thesis of the article assigned for reading the day this discussion is due.
2. Explain why you think that, and provide textual justification for your claim in the form of exegesis, not direct quotation.
3. Share some critical remarks about the article. What did the author overlook, get wrong, or what are some potential implications of the author’s claims that may be problematic in some way?
