Immunomedics was alerted that there was some negative buzz about the company in a chat room. The poster used a pseudonym, and therefore the company was unable to identify the poster for lawsuit purposes. The only information the company could ascertain was the poster’s ISP. So the company decided to subpoena the ISP for identity information of the poster in order to file suite against the poster. How should the courts handle these cases, where the company’s complaints may, or may not rise to the level of an actionable legal claim?
Should Craigslist be subject to liability for FHA violations? Why or why not? Cite appropriate legal principles when explaining your answer
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
