Creating Scientific Controversies

 

Creating Scientific Controversies CSC pp. 1-30
1. State what you think is the main point or thesis of the article assigned for reading the day this discussion is due.
2. Explain why you think that, and provide textual justification for your claim in the form of exegesis, not direct quotation.Â
3. Share some critical remarks about the article. What did the author overlook, get wrong, or what are some potential implications of the author’s claims that may be problematic in some way?

 

 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!